Page 1 of 1

Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:24 am
by Comadevil

Re: Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:27 am
by Bart331
omg....

Re: Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:11 am
by Sporting_Lisbon
makes me want to flame the game tbh, this isn't guitar hero

Re: Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:23 am
by Aaryn_GenD
i love apm it is a good way to measure... ehm ye.. :-P
i had a sc2 game where i tried my hardest to reach high apm and i reached 270+ and not too many useless clicks and such i tried everything to be reasonable

the latest vod of artosis showing upmagic playing is also nice to see. :-)

i hope that there will be fpvods in sc2, i didn't see a single one yet

Re: Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:34 am
by 36drew
APM is a good measure IMO. It is correlated with game outcome to a reasonable extent. Of course it is one of many important factors for outcome though.

I'm averaging about 110 in game (multiply by 1.3 to get real APM, since SC 2's game clock is 30% faster than real time). So i'm about 140 real time. I can't see myself ever moving faster.

Very cool clip though. That's just insane.

I'm not crap either, I spiked a 500 apm in one of my SC2 games (at like the 30 minute mark in a 2v2). Don't ask me how, it just happened. LOL.

Re: Ever wanted to see a 300 apm player in action??

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:23 am
by Aaryn_GenD
yes when did the 270 thing 8which was teh average for the whole 15min game) i just fcused on clicking all the time etc. but i really noticed that i am not made for it i mean it is one thing to just click that fast and another to process what happens in the same speed + doing the right clicks.
there lies the huge difference^^

when i play normal without focusing on it, 80-100 sc2 ingame is what i get as a result, i think it is even measured x1,4 and not x1,33 anymore or sth like that