Who whant's to play dm vs me on tad

[wicked_assassin]

Hey, it has been ages that i played dm on tad and i kinda miss it. Those lame horse guns, lame cards, etc...

Is someone intressted in playing because finding a decent player who whant's to play dm on tad is harder then finding an icebear in the sahara

grtz

[Soccerman771]

[quote=""wicked_assassin""]Hey, it has been ages that i played dm on tad and i kinda miss it. Those lame horse guns, lame cards, etc...

Is someone intressted in playing because finding a decent player who whant's to play dm on tad is harder then finding an icebear in the sahara

grtz[/quote]

That rules me out.

[wicked_assassin]

decent means: someone who knows the difference between heavy and light infantry.

btw: Finding a fp supremacy game now is also insane hard...

[36drew]

I'm up for DM any time i'm online. I'm not that good at it, but my RTS experience should make up for my lack of DM game experience.

I might have 150 DM games under my belt since the beginning of time. That's small compared to about 5000 supermacy games though.

[Aaryn_GenD]

[quote=""wicked_assassin""]Hey, it has been ages that i played dm on tad and i kinda miss it. Those lame horse guns, lame cards, etc...

Is someone intressted in playing because finding a decent player who whant's to play dm on tad is harder then finding an icebear in the sahara

grtz[/quote]

hehe wicked looking for easy prey
if you see me online you know you may kick me around as you please ops:

[Bart331]

hhmmm, its ok to give it a try allthough i dont really like it

[joe4holly]

Good luck to anyone who plays wicked , he too good at DM.

[wicked_assassin]

Thx guys i appreciate it.

Joe i'm average.

[murdilator]

I will play if you'd like. I'm up for DM just as much for treaty games.



regards,



murdilator

[LaZy]

What I find interesting is that in AoE, AoK, and their respective expansions, I would actually only play DM. The only time I wouldnt play DM would involve me playing custom scenarios, which I still alot 2day. The DM rooms on the Zone were also always more sought after than the Sup rooms. Strange that pretty much the entire comunity has gone from DM 2 Sup, myself included.

I do recall that playing Sup, which was actually called Random Map, "action" would only actually start after at least 10-15 mins. In Sup in AoEIII there is pretty much non stop action right off tha bat, even if it is just explorers trying 2 prove whose got tha bigger ego!

In DM, especially on ESO, action starts pretty much at 1,5 secs and is non stop throughout. It also seems alot more unfogiving, in the sense that within the 1st couple of mins ur building count is relatively small when compared 2 AoE or AoK.

out

[Aaryn_GenD]

ye i never understood why DM was so small in aoe3, such a shame, dismiss treaty, play DM!

and murdilator, i hope you know against who you play in wicked but it's okay, it is fun don't be depressed ;-)

[wicked_assassin]

Well honestly i never understood why dm is less popular on tad then treaty. If you like to fight with large armies, etc... why wait 40 mins?

[deadhanddan]

[quote=""wicked_assassin""]Well honestly i never understood why dm is less popular on tad then treaty. If you like to fight with large armies, etc... why wait 40 mins?[/quote] +1


i'll play some DM with anyone who would like to on fp

[etrips888]

[quote=""LaZy""]What I find interesting is that in AoE, AoK, and their respective expansions, I would actually only play DM. The only time I wouldnt play DM would involve me playing custom scenarios, which I still alot 2day. The DM rooms on the Zone were also always more sought after than the Sup rooms. Strange that pretty much the entire comunity has gone from DM 2 Sup, myself included.
[/quote]

I used to be a pure DM/scenario player on the zone as well. I don't know why, but DM back in those days just seemed more fun.

I know nothing about DM, but I would be up to try it :-P